Under proposals from Staffordshire County Council, Stone would become part of a new West Staffordshire authority alongside Newcastle-under-Lyme, South Staffordshire and Cannock Chase. The eastern authority would bring together Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire Moorlands, East Staffordshire, Lichfield and Tamworth.
. At the moment, council services in Staffordshire, outside of Stoke-on-Trent, are split between the county and district authorities. The government wants to replace this two-tier system with a single layer of unitaries providing all services, which it says will be more effective and efficient.
The county council’s proposal stands in contrast to the north-south split favoured by most other councils in Staffordshire, including Stoke-on-Trent City Council and Staffordshire Moorlands District Council. But county council leaders say their east-west proposal would meet the government’s criteria for reorganisation while giving the new unitaries the best chance of success.
The government says the new unitaries should be financially sustainable and cover ‘sensible’ economic areas, with a minimum population of around 500,000. The proposed East Staffordshire council would be by far the larger of the two, with a population of 689,784, while West Staffordshire would have 487,794 residents.
County council leader Ian Cooper said:
“Local government reorganisation could help to streamline and simplify council services, making council taxpayers money work harder.
“Unrealistic timescales and Government guidelines risk undermining this but we will put forward the strongest possible business case in November to try to make the best of this situation for Staffordshire’s residents and businesses.”
Under its previous Conservative leadership, before May’s local elections, the county council submitted an interim proposal which would have seen the county and districts outside of Stoke-on-Trent replaced with a single unitary.
In its response to the interim proposals from Staffordshire, the government said any solution for the county would need to address the financial challenges of Stoke-on-Trent City Council – which has had to request £59 million in exceptional financial support since 2024.
Article continues after this message
After receiving the government feedback, the county council explored eight different models, with consultants from PricewaterhouseCoopers being commissioned to carry out a financial appraisal of the options.
The authority initially favoured proposals for an east-west split which would keep Stoke-on-Trent separate, resulting in three unitaries.
But council leaders believe this model would be rejected by the government, and so they now prefer an East Staffordshire option that includes Stoke-on-Trent.
According to the financial analysis, this option would have a gross annual benefit of £28.8 million, the same as the north-south option.
Martin Murray, deputy leader of the county council and lead cabinet member for local government reorganisation, said:
“In an ideal world, we would avoid the burden of Stoke-on-Trent City Council’s financial distress on people across the wider county, but the Government are likely to dismiss any option that does not help to solve these long running financial problems or meet their wider criteria for change.
“We will follow the rules of the game set by Government so that they are compelled to consider the option we put forward. We want the best for our residents and businesses – this isn’t about politics, it’s about giving Staffordshire the best chance of success in the circumstances.
“Of the options that meet the government’s criteria, analysis is showing that an East-West option gives the best chance of success for both new councils. A council’s success means better services and better value for residents and businesses.”
While most other councils in Staffordshire are proposing northern and southern unitaries, West Staffordshire is one of four options being explored by Newcastle Borough Council, which opposes any merger with Stoke-on-Trent.
Cabinet members at the county council will consider the proposed model for local government reorganisation when they meet next Wednesday. A full council debate on the issue is scheduled to take place next month, with the authority due to submit its final business case by the November 28 deadline. The government will then make the final decision on how Staffordshire’s local councils are reorganised.
People comment about Stafford but remember this is the county town of Staffordshire we should be united not split up reform is just disgruntled tory just upsetting the appel cart
Shocking we need to be listened to we are dismissed and will still fight on for our Staffs Moorlands . Don’t you care how you are upsetting people we will never vote reform of this goes ahead and are considering moving it’s so unfair
It seems to me that gone are the days of local people’s councils and authoritiys what will end up happening is the major city’s will be like what London is today a hugh area of 50 miles that makes up the whole of London. Now in the north west there is not 50 miles between city’s like in the south London brimingham Wolverhampton etc mamchester is to the north and east of Liverpool and Liverpool is to the south and west now what could happen one day is that the easten part of what is now cheshire east could be run by Manchester and the likes of Warrington which is not a city even though its a big town could be run be Liverpool city thay already call it city regions and all the towns and villages will become apart of the main city authorities. To so called save money but the service will be a lot worse you only have to look at roads around east cheshire thay cant cope with looking after them now and If a city takes over the smaller towns will be forgotten as the big city’s will over look those places everything is being centralized in big area to save a few quid which fails everytime dont it.
New reduction in the number of “authorities” is only useful if it results in a significant saving in the total operating costs (salaries and pensions of employees) GOES DOWN.
It seems unbelievable to link Staffordshire Moorlands with the East and Stoke. We are forgotten about now with the council being in Stafford. Linking with everything further south will make services even worse surely, especially keeping the burden of Stone. Doesn’t seem to be consideration for the residents needs in each individual area. Sad and frustrating.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
5 comments
H j brockhurst
People comment about Stafford but remember this is the county town of Staffordshire we should be united not split up reform is just disgruntled tory just upsetting the appel cart
Lynn Farrar
Shocking we need to be listened to we are dismissed and will still fight on for our Staffs Moorlands . Don’t you care how you are upsetting people we will never vote reform of this goes ahead and are considering moving it’s so unfair
Better then you
It seems to me that gone are the days of local people’s councils and authoritiys what will end up happening is the major city’s will be like what London is today a hugh area of 50 miles that makes up the whole of London. Now in the north west there is not 50 miles between city’s like in the south London brimingham Wolverhampton etc mamchester is to the north and east of Liverpool and Liverpool is to the south and west now what could happen one day is that the easten part of what is now cheshire east could be run by Manchester and the likes of Warrington which is not a city even though its a big town could be run be Liverpool city thay already call it city regions and all the towns and villages will become apart of the main city authorities. To so called save money but the service will be a lot worse you only have to look at roads around east cheshire thay cant cope with looking after them now and If a city takes over the smaller towns will be forgotten as the big city’s will over look those places everything is being centralized in big area to save a few quid which fails everytime dont it.
Kenneth J Morris
New reduction in the number of “authorities” is only useful if it results in a significant saving in the total operating costs (salaries and pensions of employees) GOES DOWN.
Jane Wood
It seems unbelievable to link Staffordshire Moorlands with the East and Stoke. We are forgotten about now with the council being in Stafford. Linking with everything further south will make services even worse surely, especially keeping the burden of Stone. Doesn’t seem to be consideration for the residents needs in each individual area. Sad and frustrating.